From the blog drvino.com
Rustic, is it good or bad for a wine?
I think of rustic mostly as a good thing. When discussing good value wines, I think of it as off-the-beaten-path varieties or regions that maybe have some quirks or rough edges but also have a certain undeniable charm, particularly in the face of a pasteurized, homogenized wine in an "international" style.
One importer used the term “rustic authenticity” to underscore this
difference. For varieties I think of connonau, aglianico, falanghina,
pinot d’aunis, carignane, or moschofilero. For regions I think of
Fitou, Cahors, Basilicata, Sardinia, or the Halkidiki among others. Few
of these wines are meant for cellaring–they’re meant to be enjoyed
soon, with a good meal. I suppose if the term were applied to high end
wines, such as Burgundies, it would be interpreted as a bad thing or a
flaw. But in the context of good value, everyday drinking wines, it’s
something to seek out even if it does mix in some clunkers with the
charm.
What are your favorite rustic wines? Can a new world wine be rustic?